Archive for August 19th, 2008

复制内容的技巧

在excel中,要将一个单元格中的很多文字放到该单元格下面的多个单元格中,每个单元格中放一个文字。采用的方法是:

1.将单元格的列宽度调整为一个汉字宽。

2.选择单元格,Editor–>Fill–>Justify.

3. ok.

No Comments

Error in renaming a sheet in Excel

I renamed a sheet and am getting the error,  "While renaming a sheet or chart, you entered an invalid name, Try one of the following" blah blah blah. The sheet name is valid, does not have any characters and isn’t too long.

What’s the problem? Well, I searched internet and found this might solve the problem.

The following information is from: http://www.mrexcel.com/forum/showthread.php?t=157564

This topic may be dead, but i think i know what causes this phenomenon. And this might be helpful for someone else who might be searching the forum.
This happens to me every time I try to rename a sheet in an excel file that is in a "temp" directory. There are usually illegal characters in the file name, IE. "Sales Analysis -[1]". If I choose rename and name my sheet "Book1" Excel names the sheet ".xls]Book1", then you get the error.
At that point the only thing you can do is to "X" out of the workbook and select save changes. Then select file —>open and click My recent documents to open the workbook. Then click file save as, and save the file to a normal directory with a valid file name. Now you can change the invalid sheet name.

No Comments

Wikipedia

Wikipedia(http://www.wikipedia.org/ ) is really an amazing website! I love it!

Whatever I don’t know, I will go to wiki for help, for most of the time, I can find what I want in it. Of course, most of the time, I use http://en.wikipedia.org/ , not http://zh.wikipedia.org/ , as we haven’t been able to access Chinese version for a long time until a few days before Olympic 2008. Even if English version, we can’t access it for many days in Mainland China. Damn it!

Thank wiki, thank the founder, editors and donators for wikipedia.

PS,王冉在《[“奥运脚印”之5]:我还会去看没有刘翔的决赛》里说到,“中国是否在地球上正在变为一个更加受人尊敬的国家,同很多事有关,但恰恰同刘翔是否能够拿得到金牌没有那么大的关系;甚至还不如同中国民众如何对待刘翔退赛这件事的关系大。”

No Comments

标签和能力

在这个社会,人和人之间的沟通成本很是高昂。人很容易根据一些标签性的东西(比如 该人的经历,目前做得事情)来判断一个人。而根据这些标签性的东西得出的结论,只是经验性的,而非有效的。很多的时候,人们 都不愿意去找到一个有效的方法,而宁愿采取一些经验性的方式。

明宪商业评论在《短视年年有,年年都很多 http://archpei.simadu.com/archives/79说到:

日前在MSN上见到一个很多天没见的朋友,就随口问他:“最近有什么比较出色的师弟师妹没有?”他说:“有啊,你们院就有一个,叫某某。”我问:“这个人有什么出色之处?”他想了想,说:“好像去某某公司某某部门实习,我是听说的。”我等待了半天,发现他只有这一句回答,不禁疑惑,又追问道:“就这些?没有啦?”他说:“我知道的就是这些。”我笑道:“这是一个事实,不能称为出色啊。出色得用能力来证明。”对方反问我:“去某某公司某某部门实习,本来就证明他是个人才嘛。”我大笑道:“某人是现在的美国总统,这本来就证明他是个天才吗?”对方无语。

过了一会,我又问:“某某某你认识吗?看他的谈吐气质,对事情的见解,还有平常所读的书,所行的路,不但是才华横溢,而且是正人君子啊。这样的人,难道不该让我们诚心学习吗?”他说:“你说的是那个某某某?我看这个人实习的地方很一般,也没有什么很牛的公司给他发合约啊,不过是中等水平罢了,这也值得学习。”我不禁又哈哈大笑道:“某人年满70岁的时候,还给下放到江西的工厂当车工,下班了就抱着孙子坐在工厂门前晒太阳——按照你的逻辑,他大概狗屁都不是吧?”对方又无语。

短视年年有,年年都很多。

1 Comment